Nick Rehberger and Kate McGonigle/Photo: Liz Lauren
April 23, a day, firmly spring, traditionally celebrated as the one on which the poet William Shakespeare was born, can only be confirmed as the day the playwright died of unknown causes, leaving behind a body of work to be adored and disputed by editors, exegetes, enthusiasts, enemies, imitators, entertainers and directors. It is also, this year, the day when Chicago Shakespeare Theater first presented Lee Hall’s 2014 stage adaptation of Marc Norman and Tom Stoppard’s screenplay “Shakespeare in Love,” transformed from a film of reasonable subtlety to a play that wallops you in the face with its thespianic contortions, which occur when actors become overweening in their earnest determination to portray the unseen drama of their profession, splitting ears and tearing passions to tatters.
The action is set in the 1590s, when young Will (Nick Rehberger), an author of no repute, is stumbling his way through a sonnet as no writer ever wrote, except as others like to think they do, strangling on every cloddish word, whether “the,” “to” or “a,” amid snowdrifts of crumpled pages. The purpose must be to transfer the torment to the audience, which practically screams out the line from Sonnet 18 that poor Will cannot muster—at least until his good buddy, the suave dramatist Kit Marlowe (Michael Perez), turns up and hands it to him.
Queen Elizabeth (Linda Reiter), here more a Red Queen than a Gloriana, is as bored of theater as Hall apparently desires us to be, preferring an antic dog to a bad actor—really, who can disagree? Enter Viola de Lesseps (Kate McGonigle), who can penetrate the inexplicable dumbshows and noise to the essential poetry of the plays, mouthing the words along with the players, inspired by their content to experience “unbiddable, ungovernable, like a riot in the heart” love, “love as there has never been in a play.”
All the rest is a male playwright’s fantasy: of men dueling for possession of a manuscript, of women shedding their clothes and risking their lives for a taste of the stage, of Shakespeare’s greatness being nothing but theft, thus dignifying such a work. It is a mystery. (Irene Hsiao)
Chicago Shakespeare Theater, 800 East Grand, (312)595-5600, chicagoshakes.com, $20-$88. Through June 11.
Related Stories
Something Swiftly This Way Comes: A Review of Short Shakespeare! Macbeth at Chicago Shakespeare Theater Directed by Marti Lyons, this precisely abridged tale of ambition and fear embodies the radically modern possibilities of theater.
More Labor Than Love: A Review of Love's Labor's Lost at Chicago Shakespeare Theater Guest director Marti Maraden’s production of Shakespeare’s melancholic quasi-comedy is as pretty as a picture. Kevin Depinet’s rococo set, complete with retractable swing and leafy mural-like backdrop, brings us inside a Fragonard painting of flirting nymphs and eager swains. The illusion is rendered even more exquisite by Greg Hofmann’s tender, mood-attuned lighting. Unfortunately, the picture never quite springs to life.…
Herstory Lesson: A Review of Six at Chicago Shakespeare Theater Just say "yas" to these queens.
Child's Play: A Review of Us/Them at Chicago Shakespeare Theater This WorldStage Production at Chicago Shakespeare Theater renders trauma, memory and youth in its own exquisite language.
Nothing Either Good or Bad: A Review of Hamlet at Chicago Shakespeare Theater Directed by Barbara Gaines, CST's production meets but does not exceed expectations.
Beyond The Curtain: A Review of Red Velvet at Chicago Shakespeare Theater Lolita Chakrabarti's story of Ira Aldridge returns to Chicago sans fanfare.
